RESUMO
Introduction: Arterial lines are used within our intensive care unit to allow invasive blood pressure monitoring and regular blood gas analysis. Inadvertent use of dextrose containing fluids in the flush have been associated with falsely high glucose readings. When these are acted on with insulin, it can cause devastating hypoglycaemic brain injury. There have been a number of deaths and other incidents relating to the wrong fluid being used in arterial line set up reported within the UK in recent years. In 2014 the AAGBI released a safety guideline on the use of arterial lines specifically to reduce to the risk of hypoglycaemic brain injury. Objective(s): Our objective was to ensure that 100% of arterial lines in use within Royal Victoria Hospital's intensive care unit were compliant with our trust policy on the management of arterial lines. Method(s): We audited our intensive care unit's compliance with our trust policy and found that we were 80% compliant. We formed a multi-disciplinary arterial line working group in order to tackle the problem. Our quality improvement project consisted of two main approaches: 1. To educate staff on how to manage arterial lines correctly. We divided the management of arterial lines into S.A.L.T steps (a 7 step bundle on "Setting up an Arterial Line Transducer") and SUGAR checks ( a series of red flag moments to prompt staff to review the patient prior to starting or increasing insulin administration).We developed educational posters for key areas in ICU and presented our findings at departmental meetings. 2. To change the system, in order to make it easier to do the right thing. We developed a Universal Adult Arterial Pack (UAAP) containing key components in the setup of an arterial line. This also included aide memoires for the S.A.L.T steps and SUGAR checks. In order to measure the effect of these changes, we: 1. Audited compliance on a regular basis. 2. Monitored serious bundle breaches ( for example no label, wrong fluid used) 3. Assessed usage of the UAAP. Result(s): 1. Bundle compliance improved during the first half of 2021, however then reduced in the second half with the number of serious bundle breaches increasing. This coincided with COVID surge 4 - associated with reduced nursing ratios and staff redeployment. 2. UAAP usage increased throughout the project, from an average of 6 to 9 per day. 86% of staff found the packs useful and 85% thought that they reduced the potential for error. Conclusion(s): The presence of a policy does not ensure that staff will know about it or adhere to it. Although we have not yet achieved our target of 100% compliance, we have seen evidence of how our project has the potential to do so in the near future. We aim to roll out our new e-learning module for staff education, manufacture our UAAP on a bigger scale, and disseminate the project to other departments within the trust.